Huge congrats, Wyndo! You have been so intentional and thoughtful with your work and it always shines through in your writing. It just keeps getting better… cheers to that!! 🙌🏻
Congratulations on the anniversary Wyndo! Incredible achievements for your time on the platform. The articles I’ve read genuinely helped me improve my interactions with AI
Wyndo, just came across your substack last week and found it impressive. Learning AI is my top priority in 2026 and your newsletter is a great resource. Looking forward for more of the behind the scene content 🔥🔥
Congrats! The gap you’ve identified is real, and it shows up everywhere people try to teach process-heavy skills. The screen share gives you the “what.” The conversation gives you the “why I made that choice at that moment” and that’s the bit that actually transfers.
I’ve noticed the same thing running LinkedIn training. The polished write-up tells people what to do. The live session is where someone asks a question I hadn’t anticipated and the answer turns out to be more useful than anything I’d prepared.
What’s driving the decision to combine both formats rather than committing fully to one?
On the year- that curiosity loop is real. AI writing often starts raw but drifts generic over time. Early posts capture edge, later ones polish up but lose spark without checks.
Huge congrats, Wyndo! You have been so intentional and thoughtful with your work and it always shines through in your writing. It just keeps getting better… cheers to that!! 🙌🏻
Thanks Nihal :)
Appreciate this, we should catchup again later this month! 🙌🏻
It’s time :)
Congratulations on the anniversary Wyndo! Incredible achievements for your time on the platform. The articles I’ve read genuinely helped me improve my interactions with AI
Appreciated, great to know u find value out of it! :)
Jeez! Time moves so fast! Congratulations on the anniversary and all the incredible content that you share 👏
thanks Chris, appreciate all your support :)
This is impressive! And, thanks your approach to learning/using AI is very encouraging. :)
thank you, glad you resonate with what I write :)
Consistency like this compounds in ways most people underestimate.
exactly 💯
Showing the workflow is useful, but people usually need the thinking underneath it if they want to do anything real with it.
Your mix of screen share, live conversations, and blueprints feels like the right direction.
yes i think this is the right way!
Way to go Wyndo! 🙌
You need to join our livestream Jonas :)
Too busy with other things!
Wyndo, just came across your substack last week and found it impressive. Learning AI is my top priority in 2026 and your newsletter is a great resource. Looking forward for more of the behind the scene content 🔥🔥
Thank you :)
Appreciate your support! Cant wait to share more stuff!
Well done. You rock. It's very inspiring.
Appreciate you Jurgen :)
Incredible numbers man. Inspiration!
I am glad that I am a part of those 20 guest post members. Honored that you're trusting my takes and my POV on various topics.
Thanks Ilia for all your contribution to AI Maker, appreciated :)
I guess will be seeing more of your writing here soon!
Don’t spill the secrets! lol
All for the more human 🙌
Congrats on your anniversary
And year 1 calls for paper, not something digital 😏
I become more bullish on just being more human now.
this is the new moat! :)
Thank you, appreciate your support! 🙌🏻
Congrats Wyndo! As a fellow builder and someone just (re)starting their substack journey, your story is very inspiring.
Congrats! The gap you’ve identified is real, and it shows up everywhere people try to teach process-heavy skills. The screen share gives you the “what.” The conversation gives you the “why I made that choice at that moment” and that’s the bit that actually transfers.
I’ve noticed the same thing running LinkedIn training. The polished write-up tells people what to do. The live session is where someone asks a question I hadn’t anticipated and the answer turns out to be more useful than anything I’d prepared.
What’s driving the decision to combine both formats rather than committing fully to one?
On the year- that curiosity loop is real. AI writing often starts raw but drifts generic over time. Early posts capture edge, later ones polish up but lose spark without checks.
💯